UPERFECT GR16DQ vs Arzopa Z1FC

The UPERFECT GR16DQ is 22 pixels per degree sharper at a desk distance — 79 against 57, and that is the line between sharp and retina-class. Every other published specification for both is in the table, with the rows where they differ tinted.

UPERFECT GR16DQ monitor

UPERFECT

UPERFECT GR16DQ

79ppd · retina-classNo HDR~$190

A 16-inch 2560×1600 panel running at 120 Hz, which is a combination the name-brand portables charge twice as much for.

Best for: A sharp, high-refresh travel panel that can also hang on an arm

  • USB-C (DP Alt Mode)· full speed
ArzopaZ1FC16.1″ · 1920×1080

Arzopa

Arzopa Z1FC

57ppd · sharpNo HDR~$110

Around $110 buys 16.1 inches of 144 Hz here, which is why this one turns up attached to so many Steam Decks.

Best for: A handheld console's travel screen on a tight budget

  • HDMI 2.0· full speed
  • USB-C (DP Alt Mode)· full speed
Specification comparison of the UPERFECT GR16DQ and the Arzopa Z1FC
SpecificationUPERFECT GR16DQArzopa Z1FC
Approx. price~$190~$110
TypePortablePortable
Screen size16 in16.1 in
Resolution2560×16001920×1080
Aspect ratio16:1016:9
Pixels per degree79 — retina-class57 — sharp
Pixels per inch189137
PanelIPSIPS
Finishmatte—
CurvatureFlatFlat
Max refresh120 Hz144 Hz
Response time9 ms GtG13 ms GtG
VRRNoneNone
HDR tierNo HDRNo HDR
HDR certificationNoneNone
Peak brightness350 nits claimed300 nits claimed
SDR brightness350 nits300 nits
Local dimmingNoneNone
Static contrast1,200:11,000:1
Colour gamut100% sRGB106% sRGB
Colour depth10-bit8-bit
HDMI1 × HDMI, version not published1 × HDMI 2.0
DisplayPortNoneNone
DSCNot supportedNot supported
Port speed1 of 1 input at full speed2 of 2 inputs at full speed
USB-CVideo in over USB-CVideo in over USB-C
ThunderboltNoNo
KVMNoneNone
USB hubNoneNone
SpeakersBuilt inBuilt in
Standtilttilt
VESA75x75No mount
Weight1.58 lb1.72 lb
Released20222023
$ per inch$12$7
$ per megapixel$46$53

UPERFECT GR16DQ: what it gives up

  • It draws power from the host and passes none back, so the laptop battery drains faster
  • 9 ms grey-to-grey is slow for a 120 Hz panel — the refresh rate is smoother than the pixels are
  • 100% sRGB is a standard-gamut panel, so wide-gamut photo and video work is out
  • No adaptive sync, so a game that drops below 120 fps tears

Arzopa Z1FC: what it gives up

  • 13 ms grey-to-grey undoes much of what 144 Hz buys — the panel cannot keep up with the scan rate
  • No adaptive sync, so frame rates that wander produce tearing
  • It takes power from the host and gives none back, so a laptop or handheld drains faster
  • 300 nits and 1000:1 is an ordinary panel; the refresh rate is the only standout number
  • No VESA mount and no height adjustment — the built-in kickstand sets the angle

Full specifications: UPERFECT GR16DQ · Arzopa Z1FC